|
|
MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS |
Multiple Sclerosis (MS) is a common neurologic disorder and one of the leading causes of disability in
young adults. It is characterized by multiple demyelinating
lesions in the central nervous system (CNS) separated by time and space. As MS
can affect different areas of the brain, brainstem, cerebellum and spinal cord, a variety of different neurologic symptoms and signs
may be seen. The most
common temporal course in MS is a relapsing / remitting pattern. These patients
experience intermittent neurologic attacks that last days to weeks. Often,
patients recover back to their baseline, but others may have some residual
deficit following an attack. A minority of patients have a primary progressive
course. Many patients with a relapsing / remitting course will evolve into a
secondary progressive course years into their disease.
Like many presumed autoimmune disorders, MS is more common in women than men.
Although any age can be affected, it is much more common to present in younger
adults. The mean age of onset is 30. For unclear reasons, it is more common in temperate climates
compared with tropical ones. |
Pathogenesis
MS is a disorder affecting myelin in the CNS with relative preservation of
axons. The etiology remains unknown but many observations point to a likely
autoimmune disorder. Plaques usually develop in a perivenular distribution and
are characteristically seen in the periventricular white matter, brainstem, and
spinal cord. The active lesions contain T lymphocytes and macrophages. |
Common Signs and Symptoms
As noted above, patients with MS can develop a variety of neurologic symptoms
and signs. These can include cognitive, visual, cranial nerve, corticospinal,
sensory, cerebellar and/or bladder/sexual impairments. Although not completely
specific for MS, certain clinical patterns are highly suggestive of MS,
especially in the appropriate age group. These include:
•
Optic neuritis
Optic neuritis presents as an
acute unilateral loss
of vision (mainly central vision), often accompanied by pain in the eye,
that worsens with eye movement. On
examination, a relative afferent pupillary defect is usually present.
•
Uhthoff's phenomenon
This refers to an increase of neurologic symptoms
with an increase of body temperature (e.g., following exercise, a hot bath, or
fever). This phenomenon occurs as the transmission through demyelinated segments
of nerve fails with higher temperatures.
•
Internuclear Ophthalmoplegia
Horizontal gaze of the eyes is mediated by neural circuits (see
figure below) in the pons and midbrain in which the
medial longitudinal fasciculus (MLF) plays a
central role. For a
patient to gaze to one side, the control center of horizontal eye movements is
located in the ipsilateral paramedian pontine reticular
formation (PPRF). The PPRF must signal the ipsilateral CN VI nucleus
to turn the ipsilateral eye outwards (lateral rectus muscle). At the same time,
the signals must reach the subnucleus of the contralateral 3rd nerve nucleus CN
III nucleus to simultaneously turn the contralateral eye inwards (medial rectus
muscle). The MLF is the pathway that connects to the contralateral third nerve nucleus.
A lesion of the MLF does not allow the neural impulse to reach the contralateral
third nerve nucleus. This results in an eye movement abnormality known as an
internuclear ophthalmoplegia (INO). In an INO, the abducting eye moves
correctly, but the adducting eye does not. Often, the abducting eye movement is
accompanied by nystagmus. |
|
|
Above: Circuitry of
horizontal eye movements and the central role the MLF plays in mediating neural
signals to the contralateral medial rectus muscle. |
To differentiate an INO from a partial 3rd nerve
palsy, one must test convergence as convergence is not mediated through the MLF.
Thus, patients will be able to converge normally, confirming that the medial
rectus (and 3rd nerve) are functioning normally. Unilateral and bilateral INOs
are most commonly seen in patients with MS. In a younger patient, an INO is
almost always due to MS. In older individuals, an INO can be see in brainstem
stroke as well (typically basilar ischemia). |
|
|
|
Above: Unilateral
Internuclearophthalmoplegia (INO) (Lesion A in the circuitry figure above) [place
the cursor over the box and the video will play]
|
|
|
|
Above: Bilateral
Internuclearophthalmoplegia (INO) (Lesion B in the circuitry figure above) [place the cursor over the box and
the video will
play]
|
•
Lhermitte's Phenomenon
Lhermitte's phenomenon is a transient "electric
shock" or "buzzing" sensation that runs down the spine or into the limbs when
the neck in flexed (note: this sign can sometimes be seen in structural diseases
compressing the spinal cord, e.g., spondylosis, tumor, etc.). |
Diagnostic Evaluation of Suspected MS
Until the recent era, MS was often very difficult to diagnose with certainty.
Brain CT is usually normal in MS, unable to visualize the demyelinating
plaques. The diagnosis was based on a clinical course of a relapsing and
remitting disease (two or more deficits separated in time and space) in the
appropriate age group, and in the absence of another explanation. The diagnosis
was often supported by:
• CSF Abnormalities
Often the protein is elevated with some lymphocytic
pleocytosis. In addition, signs of myelin breakdown and an ongoing immune
response may be seen, especially during an attack (e.g., elevated
myelin basic
protein, oligoclonal bands, elevated
IgG synthesis rate).
• Demonstration of "Silent" Lesions
Evoked potentials (EPs) were often used to confirm the
presence of additional subclinical lesions. In these tests, a pathway was
stimulated (visual, auditory or sensory) and their resultant potentials were
recorded over the brain using scalp electrodes similar to those used during EEG.
Visual evoked potentials were useful in detecting subclinical lesions in the
optic nerves and visual pathways; auditory evoked potentials were able to detect
lesions in the brainstem (thus, they were also known as brainstem evoked
potentials); and somatosensory evoked potentials could assess the posterior
columns and rostral sensory pathways.
Although CSF studies and EPs were often used in suspected MS, many
cases were negative or equivocal. In addition, these studies are not
completely specific for MS; thus, false positives can occur.
• Magnetic Resonance Imaging
MRI has markedly improved the ability to diagnose MS
correctly. Not
only is MRI able to exclude conditions that may mimic MS, it is able to see the
characteristic demyelinating plaques in over 90% of patients. These
plaques are typically located in the deep white matter, especially in a periventricular
pattern. There are also seen in the brainstem, cerebellum and spinal cord.
Several examples follow: |
|
Above:
Note several plaques in the deep white matter. Looking closely at the image on the
left, note the small plaque in the right posterior medulla. |
|
|
Above:
Late case of MS. Note the numerous periventricular white matter plaques. |
|
|
Above:
Note the plaque in the spinal cord adjacent to the C3 level. |
Treatment
Management and treatment of MS is complex, involving both
symptomatic and
disease modifying therapy. Symptomatic therapy is available for
spasticity, tremor, fatigue, bladder dysfunction and depression.
Intravenous methylprednisolone
(solumedrol) is used for acute attacks to promote a quicker recovery. It is most
commonly used in optic neuritis. It is also used for any attack where the
symptoms are serious enough to interfere with daily functioning. However, this
treatment likely does not change the natural history of the disease.
Several disease-modifying drugs are now approved by FDA in patients with
relapsing and remitting MS. These include:
Interferon ß-1b
(Betaseron)
Interferon ß-1a (Avonex and Rebif)
Glatiramer
acetate/copolymer 1 (Copaxone)
All have been shown to significantly reduce the relapse rate as well as
reduce the burden of lesions on MRI. All are given as an injection, either by
subcutaneous or intramuscular route. They vary in how often they are given, from
once a week for Avonex, three times a week for Rebif, and daily for Betaseron
and Copaxone.
As a general rule, all patients with relapsing forms of MS should receive one of these agents indefinitely.
Treatment of the progressive phase of MS is much more difficult. A variety of
immunosuppressive regiments have been tried, including total lymphoid radiation, methotrexate, cyclophosphamide, mitoxantrone, and azathioprine. All of these
drugs are nonspecific immunosuppressive agents. They may halt a rapidly
progressive course, but are problematic to use indefinitely, as they are
associated with significant toxicity and risks.
The table below details the various disease modifying agents and when they
should be used. Please note: students are NOT expected
to know or memorize this table. |
Multiple sclerosis treatment strategies |
Disease course/stage |
Treatment options |
Evidence |
Monosymptomatic (e.g., optic neuritis)- Acute
attack |
IV
methylprednisolone, 1000 mg for 5
days, without oral taper |
Class I evidence |
Relapsing-remitting, no disease activity for
several years, and/or no activity on
MRI |
IV corticosteroids if acute attack occurs |
Class I evidence |
Relapsing-remitting, current disease activity
and/or activity on
MRI |
IV corticosteroids for acute attacks, plus for prevention (1)
interferon β-1b (Avonex), 30 µg IM weekly; or (2) interferon β-1b
(Betaseron), 1 mL SC qod; or (3) interferon β-1a (Rebif), 22 or 44
micrograms SC three times/week; or (4)
glatiramer acetate (Copaxone), 20
µg SC daily |
Class I evidence for Avonex, Betaseron Rebif and Copaxone, All
four are FDA approved |
Relapsing-remitting, disease activity while on
interferon or Copaxone |
Add monthly bolus of IV
methylprednisolone OR oral
immunosuppressants |
Class I and II evidence |
Relapsing-remitting, accumulating disability
(interferon/Copaxone/corticosteroid nonresponders) |
IV monthly
cyclophosphamide and pulse
therapy OR IV mitoxantrone (Novantrone) |
Class I evidence for Novantrone, which is FDA approved |
Rapidly progressing disability |
IV
cyclophosphamide and
corticosteroid 8-day induction, followed by pulse maintenance |
Class
III
evidence |
Very rapidly progressing disability |
Plasma exchange |
Empiric |
Secondary progressive |
IV corticosteroid monthly pulses |
Empiric |
|
IV cyclophosphamide/corticosteroid monthly pulses |
Class
III
evidence |
|
Methotrexate, oral or SC, 7.5-20 mg/wk, with or without monthly
corticosteroid pulses |
Class I evidence |
Primary progressive |
IV corticosteroid monthly pulses |
Empiric |
|
Methotrexate, oral or SC, 7.520 mg/wk, with or without monthly
corticosteroid pulses |
Empiric |
|
Cladribine, IV or SC |
Empiric |
|
Consider mitoxantrone |
Empiric |
From Bradley WG, Daroff RB, Fenichel GM, Jankovic J (eds),
Neurology in Clinical Practice (4th Ed). Philadelphia PA, Butterworth-Heinemann
2003.
|
|
|
|